Which of the following is considered acceptable conduct for an agency representative during an investigation?

Conducting interviews in private settings with the juvenile is indeed considered acceptable conduct for an agency representative during an investigation. This approach is crucial as it helps create a safe and confidential environment for the juvenile to speak openly about their experiences or concerns. Privacy fosters trust and encourages the juvenile to share information that may be essential for the investigation, without the fear of judgment or repercussions from others.

Such settings are especially important in juvenile cases, where sensitivity and the emotional state of the individual can significantly influence the quality of information gathered. Ensuring that interviews take place in a private context respects the rights of the juvenile and adheres to protocols for handling cases involving minors.

In contrast, making unannounced visits to homes can disrupt family dynamics and potentially escalate a situation. Offering legal advice to a juvenile positions the agency representative in a role that can create conflicts of interest and may overstep professional boundaries. Billing the respondent for services rendered may raise ethical concerns and complicate relationships with families seeking help, as it can shift the focus from assistance to financial transactions. These practices do not align with the ethical standards expected in juvenile investigations.