Which criteria is NOT applicable for Non-Secure Custody?

Non-secure custody refers to a situation in which a juvenile can be placed in a less restrictive environment compared to secure custody, typically with the aim of addressing behavioral issues while allowing for some freedom and support. The criteria that apply to non-secure custody generally focus on the best interests of the juvenile and the context of their behavior or situation.

When considering the question, the fact that a juvenile is charged with a felony is not a valid basis for non-secure custody under the principles of juvenile law. Charge severity often necessitates a more secure environment, as there may be a higher risk to the community or potential flight risk associated with serious offenses. Therefore, a felony charge typically does not align with the criteria for placement in a non-secure setting.

Other criteria, such as a juvenile being a runaway and consenting to non-secure custody, or the court determining that non-secure placement is in the juvenile's best interests, are valid under juvenile law. Additionally, a juvenile's refusal of non-secure custody indicates at least some awareness and agency, which is also a relevant consideration but generally does not disqualify them from being placed in a non-secure arrangement.

In summary, the connection between the seriousness of felony charges and the appropriateness